With a tenacious prejudice perhaps connected to their profession, scientists have always considered anthropogenesis to be a problem of an exclusively cognitive order, as if the becoming human of man were solely a question of intelligence and brain size and not also one of ethos, as if language did not also and above all pose problems of an ethical and political order, as if homo sapiens was not also, and of course precisely for that reason, a homo iustus.
  1. autochthones said: Dude this is so far from true for biological/physical anthropologists (the ones that do bi-cultural evolution) and even some biologists (Gould, etc)
  2. interruptions posted this